On the ground level, we build organisations from the ground up. Decisions are based on knowledge from experience of feelings, senses and emotions where people are closely related not only by locations and kingship but also by common values, customs and tribes.
Rule mainly by instincts and desires, subjective material developments are usually organised according to a hierarchical structure. In time, citizens would have learned to separate their subjective feelings and emotions from progressive development. It is typical of bureaucratic organisations saving money.
The separation of feelings and emotions from progressive developments restored the function of the mind. Learnings from the subjective world gave rise to objective developments to the stable organisation of society. And decisions are influenced from the mind or top down.
Once we wonder outside the framework of feelings, emotions and the mind that we are familiar with, we are on the edge of the unknown. The third level mainly deals with God, aliens and demons. But knowing our human nature, some have made it to the third level on instincts and desires or by accident. They make frequent clients of psychiatry.
Let's say 'unknown' suggests there could be something in there but we don't know and 'unknowable' is beyond experience and means of knowing. This realm of the dark exists outside our conventional means is referred to in here as externals; the realm of God, aliens and demons.
The function of the senses may not make sense of perceptions of the unknown. But elevation of logic (metaphysics) or rational thought attempts to make sense of belief. Let me make an assertion in here that A.I. is here and by collecting existing data from both dynamics of existece (1st & 2nd levels), it is able to predict an outcome in the future.
From this prediction, I have suggested that if you place a businessman in a social organisation, he is likely to exploit the community to make a profit. But if you place a person who is familiar with values of humanity in a social organisation, he/she is likely to promote human social needs. The achievement of social needs gives rise to profit.
However, A.I. outcomes or predictions stretch reality to the unknown and progressive developments are now build on the unknown. Well, data collected from real experience concludes a known outcome. The outcome is then stretched to attempt at something new like stretching reality. But this reality has to be stabilised for it to work. And according tothe a priori test, it is not new. A.I. is merely recycling reality and we project the impression that we are turning when in fact we are cycling in the same position. We are not progressing instead we are standing still.
The a priori as previously defined, is a pure principle. It is not based on a copy, similarity or imitation of existing nature. I suppose it makes sense why trials and statistics are collected in tests for patents and copyrights.
Nonetheless, the a priori is also subjective. The task of the alchemist is to transform the principle into being. Since it is a principle, it has to be objective. I have also defined objective as not necessarily right or wrong, but serves a stabilising function in the organisation of society.
The methodology in here is positive. The term principle is applied as positive, for example; a bomb's principle is to help level areas for road and building developments and not for destroying the neighbour's homes.
So a pure principle is not only new, but also positive and practical. From existing data, can A.I. produce something pure and practical that hasn't existed before? I don't think so.
When we are experiencing life from the tip of our nose or senses, we are also collecting data to help with feelings and in turn emotions. And we become aware of things that make us feel good or bad and comfortable or fearful. And conscious awareness tend to help us into things that make us feel good and comfortable. And our awareness of pure principles is conscious of things good; comfortable; practical and objective. The point is, we don't usually sit down to collect data in order to make these principle decisions. Armed with pure principles, we become consciously aware instantly.
Now, if you place a business man who has a data collection of exploitation to make principle decisions of the future, you are likely to have a homeless sector of the population after their homes have become unaffordable or been bombed. That's not a principle decision.
Some religions have claimed that it is God who placed the principle idea in your mind that transcends practical decisions. It is belief and hope for good and practical things to come that influence one's decisions. When the principle idea is practiced that the subjective is brought into being hence, the existence of God.
And subjective material developments at this level are interpreted by some as demonic. As for the existence of God, I supposed those who believe in demons may also carry out their demonic work, but like the businessman, they fail to practice an objective and harmless outcome.
And for alien phenomena, they only exist in Area 51 USA to improve their weapons of mass destruction!